What's the best hosting cheap?

The jungle of hosting is very varied both in price ranges that offered proposals.

For services with high performance solutions are always cheaper abroad and in particular the U.S..

For economic solutions should instead go in Italy. This kind of hosting aimed at users that require expert and ease of use and good support, things are certainly easier to have in Italian.

Coming to the question of this post, without too many rounds without unnecessary words and lists the best economic hosting Italy in my personal experience is Tophost , well ahead in value for money compared to many others.

With just under 11 euros (taxes included) you can have Topweb plan, which includes:

  • Registering a domain extensions to choose from. EN. COM. NET. ORG. INFO. EU;
  • 500 megs of web space (Apache server with PHP and CGI);
  • 4 MySQL database;
  • email management;
  • DNS management domain;
  • Other ancillary services included;

Servizio Hosting a buon prezzo Or you can choose from the other deals available, even better service TopName for registering the domain only.

Of similar services I have to say that I have tried different also slightly more expensive (like Aruba, which costs about twice), but the only acceptable reliability and completeness (DNS management and 4 db) was TopHost. Which inter alia is used to make pleasant surprises to customers, such as super discounts, transfer a few cents or free coupons for Adwords.

I advise you to try. Also because this very blog is based on TopWeb and it works well, also registered and activated a new plan will receive a bonus of as many as 50 Euro Google AdWords .
You have similar solutions with which you found right?

New graphics for Ebay

Ebay Had become very outdated, but familiar, graphics Ebay.

Maybe not to confuse users the changes made over time have always been few.

Today you can see a rather substantial change in the product pages.

The restyling was already present for some time on other versions (already had seen it on ebay.de) the most famous auction site in the world.

What do you think?

Galileo's telescope - Galileo's telescope Galielo

Today Google.it Galielo celebrates the 400th anniversary of Galileo and his most famous invention, ie the telescope. It was in 1609 that Galileo patented his telescope.

We would have expected a link to search [ Galileo's telescope ] but, strangely, the celebratory logo strives to SERP [ Galileo's telescope ] and also has the title and caption in English: 400th Anniversary of Galileo's Telescope.

An oversight or a precise choice? I should not wonder a correct translation in the next few hours.

Galileo's telescope

Another special URL link that follows highlights a more invasive javascript.
Trascendetale nothing but a curiosity, because html is the link to this url
http://www.google.it/search?q=Galileo% 27s + telescope & ct = & s = galileo09 ddle
instead the address to which you are sent back via the click through javascript (I'm testing with Firefox) that is
http://www.google.it/ # q =% 27s + Galileo telescope galileo09 & ct = & s = & fp = ddle 55c42ba9d4a49393

Cosina 55mm f/1.4 Objective Cosinon Cars

I just get a manual lens I was looking for a couple of weeks and then I finally found on Ebay.

This is the Cosinon Auto f = 55mm F = 1.4, a focal length lens mount M42 and dated, but excellent quality, all-metal with an opening that makes it ideal for bright and blur the background or for shots without flash.

Within a couple of days should get the Minolta AF-M42 adapter to fit it on my Sony Alpha.

Just try it will post on the blog a couple of clicks.

How about these lenses?

cosina-cosinon-55mm-f-1.4

cosina-cosinon-55-f1.4

cosina-cosinon-55mm-f1.4

Problems waiting for Google Sitemaps

strumenti-webmaster-google Several users of Google Webmaster Tools are encountering problems from one month to this part by checking the sites and sending (or resending) Sitemaps.

The problem occurs with the continued state of "waiting" attesa for days.

It is a known problem with your engineers and for which one can not help but wait ..

In contrast to the view expressed by Google, I would say that in many situations the problem may cause delays in indexing.

Surf anonymous, safe, really?

Utente anonimo There are dozens of online services, some free, some for sale, offering navigation "anonymous".

The question arises: is truly anonymous using this site?
The answer is somewhat obvious: on the Internet, there may be varying degrees of anonymity, but never anonymity in an absolute sense.

On sites that I manage it happened very often receive visits from Anonymouse.org .

In particular, in one case a user of a forum that he wanted to send insults without being traced.
But he only had the merit of stimulating my fancy computer ...

The method explained below, designed by me, but the weather may have been used by others, I need to stop and identify that attacker who was playing hide and seek.

The sample will be developed in broad Anonymouse.org his recital, but the method may be adapted, expanded and used for other services.

Analysis of the service:

Site http://anonymouse.org/ is a field where you can type any web address to view anonymously.

The web page is then called by Anonymouse server, which acts as a proxy.
All links on the page (text links, recalls, css and javascript and images) are replaced with other filters, to avoid losing anonymity. That is, for example, if you visit a page www.matarrelli.com, links to home page html code contained in all become like this:

http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http//www.matarrelli.com/

So even clicking it remains shielded. The same applies to all links to other pages and javascript references and images that become like this:

http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http//www.matarrelli.com/script.js

http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http//www.matarrelli.com/immagine.jpg

Thus it remains anonymous browsing, including scripts and images are retrieved with its own IP and user agent, but to Anonymouse ..
Put simply never allows him to track because no request is made directly from the browser to the destination server.

So how do you recognize?

We act in a hybrid, combining operations with server-side Javascript, which acts known to the client side.

The server requests made by Anonymouse have two characteristics:

  1. Ip, although it might change over time. I have carried out checks in this regard;
  2. User Agent, which is always the same and is http://Anonymouse.org/ (Unix);

Pause our attention on the user agent, which is constant over time.
We can instruct the server to recognize it and perform operations as "special".
We can, if we are on platform Apache, set the htaccess so whenever the user agent Anonymouse It contains the word instead of showing the page request, show a page called ad hoc anonimo.php

RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond% (HTTP_USER_AGENT) Anonymouse
RewriteRule (.*) anonimo.php

With this step we have inhibited access to the site, because the user does not see the requested page, but always page anonimo.php

But we want to do more, we find the real IP of the user. Here comes the Javascript code that will be put in the file anonimo.php.

As previously stated, any reference in the javascript version is replaced screen, so the original code:

<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src=" http//www.matarrelli.com/script.js "> </ script>

is replaced with:

<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src=" http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http//www.matarrelli.com/script.js "> < / script>

We must necessarily fool the bots that make substitutions.
One way to do it, very simple and effective, would not you like to address recall, but to make the javascript call to same, chip properly. Here's what I mean:

<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript">
document.write ('<script type = "text / javascript"' + 'language = "javascript" s' +' rc ="');
document.write ('ht' + 'tp'+'://'+' ww' + 'w');
document.write ('matarrelli' + '. com');
document.write ('/ script.j' + 's ">');
</ Script>

In that case javascript itself invokes another script, reconstructing the original address for more pieces of string. Anonymouse unable to identify the transaction, which will therefore screen.

The reference to the file script.js is made directly from your browser to the server that contains the web page. Anonymous is entirely bypassed.

Script.js file can include several things, the easiest thing is to enter a file to redirect processing to store the ip and the user agent's original:

document.location.href = "http://www.matarrelli.com/log.php;

Log.php file can be constructed very simply:

<? Php

$ Filename = "anonimi.php;

/ Fishing / user data
$ Ua = $ _SERVER ["HTTP_USER_AGENT"] / / UA
$ Ip = getenv ('REMOTE_ADDR'), / / ip address

/ / Identifies the exact time and date
$ Day = date ("D");
$ Date = date ("d");
$ Hour = date ("H");
$ Minutes = date ("i")
$ Month = date ("F");
$ Year = date ("Y");

/ / Stores the data in the file name $ filename
if (($ fp = fopen ($ filename, "a"))) die ("can not open or create the file");
$ Html = "<p style=\"font-size:9px;\">".. "$ Date".. "$ Month".. "$ Year." - ". .":". $ Hours $ minutes. "\ n". "User Agent." ua $. "\ n". "IP". $ ip. "\ n". "</ p>";
fwrite ($ fp, $ html);
fclose ($ fp);

?>

Anonimi.php is stored in the file date and time of the visit, along with original IP and user agent.

Mission accomplished, the anonymous is unmasked.

PS by identifying IP (do not know what satisfaction :-) ) The user was banned from my forum is anonymous with the nickname he had created with what is normally used for writing.

« 3 4 5 6 7 » ... Last » Page 5 of 10 «First ... « third 4 5 6 7 » ... Last »